The Appeal Judgment Given by the Regional Court: A Document of Criminalzing the Demand for Peace

On February the 25th, 2019, Istanbul Regional Court of Justice has given its final verdict on the case of Prof. Dr. Füsun Üstel. The decision dismisses the appeal of the verdict, which was given last year by the court of first instance, and thereby gives a definitive judgment the 15 months of imprisonment for Prof. Üstel. 

The text of the judgment reads as follows:










Case-Decision Nr: 2018/916

Docket Nr – 2019/250

Case Nr :                     2018/916

Docket Nr:                   2019/250



COURT                                                                      Istanbul 32ndAssize Court

DATE                                                             April04, 2018

NUMBER                                                                   Case No: 2017/54 and Decision No: 2018/88

VERDICT                                                                  Propaganda for a Terrorist Organization

DEFENDANT                                                Zübeyde Füsun Üstel

DATE OF CRIME                                                    January 11, 2016


VERDICT                                                                   Sentence in pursuance of Article 7/2-1, and 7/2-2 ofLaw No. 371; Articles 62/1, and 53 of Turkish Penal Code

APPELLANT                                                            Counsel for the defendant


Upon application for appeal against conviction by the local court, the time of the application, the quality of the verdict and the case pursuant to the date of crime were reviewed.

As the application is not inadmissible on any ground, the Court has examined the substance of the application.

Following the examination of the reports and documents that reflect the process of hearing where the conscientious opinion was formed, the content of the justification and the whole case;

It is observed that the judgement of the Court does not include any illegality, neither in substance nor in procedure; that there is no deficiency in the evidence and procedures; that the findings are well supported by evidence; that the acts were identified correctly and fall within the definition of the crime established by law; and that the sentence is in accordance with the law. As the grounds presented by the counsel for the appellant in his application for appeal do not appear well-founded, in pursuance of Article 280/1-a of the CMK (Law of Criminal Procedure), the Court DISMISSES THE APPEAL ON SUBSTANTIAL GROUNDSand holds that the case shall be referred back to the court of first instance that issued the conviction;

 The judgement was rendered by majority, Judge Nihat Demirkol dissenting, on February 25, 2019, and it is definitive, in pursuance of Articles 284 and 286/2-a of the CMK.

  1. SARIÇAM S. ÖZTÜRK               N. DEMİRKOL        T.GEMEÇ

President                      Judge                           Judge                                       Registrar

40019                          39876                         98282                                      58801

(e-signed)                     (e-signed)                     (e-signed)                                 (e-signed)



It can be observed that the statement, which is the subject of the crime stated in the indictment, includes, in short, accusations against “the State of the Republic of Turkey, committing deliberately planned massacre, mass execution of people in certain places, implementing massacre and deliberate deportation toward the people in the region”, and similar allegations. By the allegations and accusations with this content, stated within the frame of the indictment, the State and Government of the Republic of Turkey are publicly insulted, and thus the existing statement, which was written and issued in such form, goes beyond the expression of opinion and constitutes a crime, so that the act of the applicant falls within the crime of “publicly insulting the State of the Republic of Turkey, the Government of the Republic of Turkey”, defined in Article 301/1 of the Turkish Penal Code. Thus, I do not agree with the majority decision to dismiss the applicant’s appeal against the conviction for the crime of propagandizing for a terrorist organization. In my opinion, the local court conviction should be overturned; our Court should order a stay of proceedings to apply for permission of investigation, since according to the Article 301/4 of the Turkish Penal Code the investigation of this crime is subjected to the permission of the Ministry of Justice; henceforth, depending on the result of the application, a judgement shall be rendered, that would also assess the defendant’s act against Article 44 of the Turkish Penal Code.

Dissenting Judge (98282)





OpenEdition suggests that you cite this post as follows:
academicsforpeace (April 8, 2019). The Appeal Judgment Given by the Regional Court: A Document of Criminalzing the Demand for Peace. Academics for Peace - A Case Study. Retrieved July 20, 2024 from

You may also like...

Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search